SpecialAttack.net
https://forum.specialattack.net/

The Gallery
https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=7628		 Page 17 of 25
Author:  ^grinch [ 29 Mar 2011, 01:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:
^grinch wrote:
Tinkerbell - your shots look reeeeeeeally oversaturated O_o
so? are there rules on saturation?
umad?
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 29 Mar 2011, 01:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
^grinch wrote:
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:

so? are there rules on saturation?
umad?
shhh, back to your cave.
Author:  ^grinch [ 29 Mar 2011, 01:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:
^grinch wrote:

umad?
shhh, back to your cave.
slightly offtopic: trolling hard rnt we?

on topic: there obv is no _rule_ on saturation/editing photos but my question / post about how imho tinkerbells pics are really oversaturated wasn't aiming at telling her they're bad / she's doin it wrong either.
it just looks not natural at all and detail gets lost due to glowing red etc. so i thought she might have been messing around with the saturation in photoshop a bit too much (hard to judge without a colorimeter) OR the 60d's colours are really weird / unnatural.

Sidenote: im mildly sad about how heavily edited pics get most positive comments and raw pics with just some subtle correction get no attention at all (in this thread and on flickr / every bigger photo community)~
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 29 Mar 2011, 01:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
^grinch wrote:
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:

shhh, back to your cave.
slightly offtopic: trolling hard rnt we?

on topic: there obv is no _rule_ on saturation/editing photos but my question / post about how imho tinkerbells pics are really oversaturated wasn't aiming at telling her they're bad / she's doin it wrong either.
it just looks not natural at all and detail gets lost due to glowing red etc. so i thought she might have been messing around with the saturation in photoshop a bit too much (hard to judge without a colorimeter) OR the 60d's colours are really weird / unnatural.

Sidenote: im mildly sad about how heavily edited pics get most positive comments and raw pics with just some subtle correction get no attention at all (in this thread and on flickr / every bigger photo community)~
umad?

Whatever it was, be it a tweak done in software or whatever, looks pretty cool to me. Maybe if you ask someone a question about saturturation you should end it with a question mark, otherwise it just comes off as a critical remark.

I'd also appreciate it if you didn't go running off to IRC to slag me off, princess. :wink:
Author:  ^grinch [ 29 Mar 2011, 02:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:
^grinch wrote:

slightly offtopic: trolling hard rnt we?

on topic: there obv is no _rule_ on saturation/editing photos but my question / post about how imho tinkerbells pics are really oversaturated wasn't aiming at telling her they're bad / she's doin it wrong either.
it just looks not natural at all and detail gets lost due to glowing red etc. so i thought she might have been messing around with the saturation in photoshop a bit too much (hard to judge without a colorimeter) OR the 60d's colours are really weird / unnatural.

Sidenote: im mildly sad about how heavily edited pics get most positive comments and raw pics with just some subtle correction get no attention at all (in this thread and on flickr / every bigger photo community)~
umad?

Whatever it was, be it a tweak done in software or whatever, looks pretty cool to me. Maybe if you ask someone a question about saturturation you should end it with a question mark, otherwise it just comes off as a critical remark.

I'd also appreciate it if you didn't go running off to IRC to slag me off, princess. :wink:

still trolling :F
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 29 Mar 2011, 02:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
yawn, moving on.
Author:  TinkerBell [ 29 Mar 2011, 08:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
^grinch wrote:

Sidenote: im mildly sad about how heavily edited pics get most positive comments and raw pics with just some subtle correction get no attention at all (in this thread and on flickr / every bigger photo community)~

Its not my problem if you feel like you dont get this enough attention you need....

I did not work this much on the colours, HERE flowers havbe really intens colours, you know...
Author:  [SpA]Migu [ 29 Mar 2011, 08:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Guys, please...
Don't make this thread go the same route every other thread seems to go.
Grinch had an opinion (although I agree he could have expressed it in a different way), no need to crush him for that.
Especially not here, this thread is for enjoying pictures.

So bring on the next photos please and leave this bullshit outside! :wink:
Author:  DrMcMoist [ 29 Mar 2011, 10:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Hmm
Author:  ^grinch [ 29 Mar 2011, 11:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Image
Author:  annarack [ 29 Mar 2011, 12:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
I love sunsets :26
Author:  dckjns [ 29 Mar 2011, 12:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
nice. though you might want to resave that, pretty harsh compression artifacts
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 29 Mar 2011, 14:22 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Sorry guys, I had no intention to derail or turn the thread to shit. I just did not think the comments were appropriate for something that should be considered accountable to artistic license. Comments should be constructive or complimentary imo.

Now come on Neo, i want to see more bugs :)
Author:  [SpA]Neoflo [ 29 Mar 2011, 18:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Hey :18
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:
Now come on Neo, i want to see more bugs :)
I heard you dear ballz :).

Image

Image

Image

Image
Author:  ^grinch [ 29 Mar 2011, 18:18 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
m3n wrote:
nice. though you might want to resave that, pretty harsh compression artifacts
fixed that!
Image

Image

Image


edit: awesome shots, Neo!!!

totally in love with your colourbalancing! hope i'll get there at some point :3
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 29 Mar 2011, 19:14 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]Neoflo wrote:
Hey :18
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:
Now come on Neo, i want to see more bugs :)
I heard you dear ballz :).

Image

Image

Image

Image
Ask and you shall receive! Truly stunning mate :D

As you are in france, and we have a house there and have been going to it for 17 years, ive seen some freaky bugs!
Can you get a shot of that weird half bumble bee half snail thing, and there is this translucent spider/centipede thing!

That is your mission ;) Good luck!
Author:  TinkerBell [ 29 Mar 2011, 19:18 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
I love your photos Neo :) Wanna see more :5:
Author:  [SpA]Neoflo [ 29 Mar 2011, 19:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]ProtectMyBalls wrote:

As you are in france, and we have a house there and have been going to it for 17 years, ive seen some freaky bugs!
Can you get a shot of that weird half bumble bee half snail thing, and there is this translucent spider/centipede thing!

That is your mission ;) Good luck!
What a mission ^^, I will Sir!
But you're not talking about the Bumble Bee Snail? Or it's a bug?

And thanks TinkerBell :5:

As you ask, here some more :

Image

Image

Image

Image
Author:  TinkerBell [ 29 Mar 2011, 19:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
:5:

I love your lense; its the canon 100 mm 2,8, right? I want to byu it too. Do you have the one with stabilizer or without?
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 29 Mar 2011, 20:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Its a flying insect, that has a bumble bee body, but a snail like head... i have no idea what it is actually called!!

GOOD LUCK :ugly:
Author:  [SpA]Neoflo [ 29 Mar 2011, 22:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]TinkerBell wrote:
:5:

I love your lense; its the canon 100 mm 2,8, right? I want to byu it too. Do you have the one with stabilizer or without?
Yes its the Canon 100 mm macro F2.8 USM, and not the L with stabilizater. From some reviews I read, tought I made the good choice. L is good just for a more stab, tropicalization etc... and high price :).

Ballz : Ok, I'll check for that :p
Author:  [SpA]Migu [ 29 Mar 2011, 22:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Awesome as always Neo! :4
Damn, I wanted to buy a Tele soon, but those shots make me want a large aperture lens. Why isn't there a lens that does everything without costing thousands of dollars? :P
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 29 Mar 2011, 22:48 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]Neoflo wrote:

Ballz : Ok, I'll check for that :p
its a real bug trust me! i just have no idea how to find it on google :S
Author:  DrMcMoist [ 29 Mar 2011, 23:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Hmm
Author:  annarack [ 29 Mar 2011, 23:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
I love my nifty fifty, but I ohhhh so want a macro now, I blame Neo :ugly:
Author:  DrMcMoist [ 29 Mar 2011, 23:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Hmm
Author:  ^grinch [ 29 Mar 2011, 23:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
[SpA]DrMcMoist wrote:
^grinch wrote:

fixed that!
Image

Image

Image


edit: awesome shots, Neo!!!

totally in love with your colourbalancing! hope i'll get there at some point :3
Is that the sun in the first picture, or did you put that picture through Paint and just make a white circle with the paint tool? O_o
That's the sun, got some weird reflections due to clouds being around and infront of it too
Author:  DrMcMoist [ 02 Apr 2011, 21:24 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Hmm
Author:  ProtectMyBalls [ 02 Apr 2011, 21:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Birdie doesnt look happy ^^

haha that lama looks fucking rude! nice shots mate! :5:
Author:  [SpA]Migu [ 02 Apr 2011, 23:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Gallery
Is the last shot a 100% crop at 200mm by any chance?
Cool pictures! :5:
Page 17 of 25 All times are UTC+02:00

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited