SpecialAttack.net :: aaaaargh

Only u mcmoist would see something like that in a candy wrapping o.O

Plus look at the little green guy. He has a total sex face on. I should know, cause it's very similiar to MY sex face. It's like looking in a mirror. Which I often do whilst having sex.

[SpA]DrMcMoist wrote:

Plus look at the little green guy. He has a total sex face on. I should know, cause it's very similiar to MY sex face. It's like looking in a mirror. Which I often do whilst having sex.

U look at urself when having sex? Doesnt that make u... like... screwing urself in a way? I mean.... o.O U know what i mean O.O

I still think 24 is an awesome series!
Season 1 and 2 where great, 3 and 4 not quite as much but still ok, 5 was propably the best, 6 was ok.

About Night Rider: it's sad that a remake of a hit series by a major network with alot of money turns out to be this shitty. If you compare that to Battlestar Galactica, a remake with limited funds on a small network, which turns out to be one of the best series ever...

By the way - I watched the 24 season 7 prequel and to my surprise it was quite good (God, I missed some good acting after stuff like Chuck or Knight Rider) but from what I gather it didn't have much in common with the upcoming season, which will take place in America (not in Africa like the prequel). I wonder if season 7 will be less ridiculous than the previous seasons in 24 which escalated into comic-book style kill counts and villains. I mean - the first season was brilliant, with a novel story-telling style, a smart and believable plot and people NOT using helicopters to get to the next bus stop only to keep up the real-time premise. Then, the threats became more and more ridiculous - biological weapons, one nuke, SEVERAL nukes, DOZENS of nukes in the form of nuclear power plants... The only step up from this would be an alien invasion. ;-)

Author:	dckjns [ 28 Nov 2008, 18:30 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
VillageCrackHead wrote: Only u mcmoist would see something like that in a candy wrapping o.O Baal Kagan wrote: http://www.sagen.at/texte/gegenwart/IMA ... am_sex.jpg[/b] Apparently someone else did too EDIT: Missed the middle page

Author:	[SpA]Bucky [ 28 Nov 2008, 18:52 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
Yoo, some more nice cars, but Lim, you're wrong about the truck. First of all, I don't give a shit about parking if I can drive a truck like that, 2nd of all, it outperforms the mustang You should check out some charts before you say the accelaration is crap And I just love the car, so if I could afford it, I wouldn't know any reason not to get it Together with all the other cars mentioned here with a ton of other cars as well The koenigzeg, feraris, etc.

Author:	Lim-Dul [ 28 Nov 2008, 18:55 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
I said the acceleration, top speed and handling are crap if you compare it to a non-truck car with the same engine (I wrote "by comparison" in brackets). =) Of course it outperforms the Mustang acceleration-wise because it has 200 more bph! Compare the Dodge to e.g. the Chevrolet Corvette Z06 with 505 bph! 0-100 in 3.7 seconds. Alternatively you could just compare the RAM SRT-10 to the Viper, which the engine originally comes from... By the way - if I had lots of money I wouldn't buy tons of similar-ish cars - I would probably own just several, each one for a different occasion. I wouldn't throw away too much money without getting more performance so I'd settle with a "modest" Porsche 997 Turbo or even a Nissan GT-R (to be tuned later :-D) or Audi R8. ^^ Speaking of sports cars - you don't need expensive cars to have fun on a circuit, empty road or abandoned parking lot. I love to do power-slides in my old Seat Cordoba diesel. ;-) In fact, if you go for the expensive super-cars THINKING you can drive them like Michael Schumacher, you'll most likely end up like this: Woohoo - a ~1.000.000 Euro wreck. ;-) P.S. I just checked the charts and your Dodge SRT-10 truck does NOT outperform a standard Mustang GT - at least not in the quad-cab version (4 doors) which you posted - acceleration is exactly the same @ 4.9s for 0-100 (4.8 for the two-door version). All that with 200 bph more - epic fail! Also, since the SRT-10 is a special version of the Dodge Ram it would be only fair to compare it to the Mustang Shelby GT500 (500 bhp - what do you know, good comparison! - 0-100 in 4.6 s) or even the Mustang Shelby GT500KR (540 bhp, 0-100 in 4.1 s), both of which are cheaper and outperform the SRT-10. Ha!

Author:	DrMcMoist [ 28 Nov 2008, 19:27 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
VillageCrackHead wrote: Only u mcmoist would see something like that in a candy wrapping o.O Mate, it's clear as day. He's giving him it something awful. Not that the Lemon isn't enjoying it, cause he clearly is. Plus look at the little green guy. He has a total sex face on. I should know, cause it's very similiar to MY sex face. It's like looking in a mirror. Which I often do whilst having sex. Phwoar. Yeah. Give it to this bitch. Who's the man? You are. Yeah.

Author:	Lim-Dul [ 28 Nov 2008, 19:34 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
That's your sex face, McMoist? Hmmm... 0_o

SpecialAttack.net https://forum.specialattack.net/

aaaaargh https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=4330	Page 3 of 3

Author:	[SpA]CrackHead [ 28 Nov 2008, 21:13 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
[SpA]DrMcMoist wrote: Plus look at the little green guy. He has a total sex face on. I should know, cause it's very similiar to MY sex face. It's like looking in a mirror. Which I often do whilst having sex. U look at urself when having sex? Doesnt that make u... like... screwing urself in a way? I mean.... o.O U know what i mean O.O

Author:	[SpA]YellowGoudvis [ 29 Nov 2008, 01:05 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
VillageCrackHead wrote: [SpA]DrMcMoist wrote: Plus look at the little green guy. He has a total sex face on. I should know, cause it's very similiar to MY sex face. It's like looking in a mirror. Which I often do whilst having sex. U look at urself when having sex? Doesnt that make u... like... screwing urself in a way? I mean.... o.O U know what i mean O.O OMG no plz!

Author:	kaikai! [ 29 Nov 2008, 13:29 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
[SpA]demm wrote: I still think 24 is an awesome series! Season 1 and 2 where great, 3 and 4 not quite as much but still ok, 5 was propably the best, 6 was ok. About Night Rider: it's sad that a remake of a hit series by a major network with alot of money turns out to be this shitty. If you compare that to Battlestar Galactica, a remake with limited funds on a small network, which turns out to be one of the best series ever... 24 is awesome! Anyone seen the 1,5 hour Season 7 intro?

Author:	Lim-Dul [ 29 Nov 2008, 14:56 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
kaikai - last page: [SpA]Lim-Dul wrote: By the way - I watched the 24 season 7 prequel and to my surprise it was quite good (God, I missed some good acting after stuff like Chuck or Knight Rider) but from what I gather it didn't have much in common with the upcoming season, which will take place in America (not in Africa like the prequel). I wonder if season 7 will be less ridiculous than the previous seasons in 24 which escalated into comic-book style kill counts and villains. I mean - the first season was brilliant, with a novel story-telling style, a smart and believable plot and people NOT using helicopters to get to the next bus stop only to keep up the real-time premise. Then, the threats became more and more ridiculous - biological weapons, one nuke, SEVERAL nukes, DOZENS of nukes in the form of nuclear power plants... The only step up from this would be an alien invasion. ;-)

Author:	kaikai! [ 29 Nov 2008, 16:27 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
oh, sorry. my landlord had this party yesterday, so I didn't get much sleep. Stupid landlord...

Author:	DrMcMoist [ 29 Nov 2008, 17:42 ]
Post subject:	Re: aaaaargh
God damn. That advertising is blatant. They're basically saying "Eat Maoam's. It's like having sex with a Lemon"

Page 3 of 3	All times are UTC+01:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited