SpecialAttack.net https://forum.specialattack.net/ |
|
Question of the day https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=11296 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | [SpA]Revenge [ 20 Jul 2011, 10:19 ] |
Post subject: | Question of the day |
Ok guys so todays question of the day is Would you rather get rid of Chicken, or Cows? Bear in mind that if you lose Chickens you have lost eggs, and if you lose Cows then you have lost milk. At the end of the day i will post my answer. If people find this popular I will post one tomorrow. |
Author: | annarack [ 20 Jul 2011, 10:52 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Well, I'm not much a fan of chickens but I do use their eggs in my cooking and then again it wouldn't be any loss because there are other birds that you can use for eggs and eating. Not fussed on eating chickens myself. I love beef and milk. But to be honest because of the mass production of cows they are slowly killing the ozone, so I'd say cows. Plus there are many other animals that are just as tasty as a nice juicy steak and also produce milk ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]don_don_don [ 20 Jul 2011, 11:57 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
I'd say bye bye to the chickens. My morning milkshake keeps me going through the day ^^ |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 20 Jul 2011, 11:59 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
I'd say we merge em. Egg laying milk containing cows which sit on a stick all day. |
Author: | annarack [ 20 Jul 2011, 12:05 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Wouldn't that make it a lollypop? ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 20 Jul 2011, 12:07 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
[SpA]annarack wrote: Wouldn't that make it a lollypop?
One hell of a huge lollypop then! ![]() ![]() |
Author: | ProtectMyBalls [ 20 Jul 2011, 12:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
[SpA]SaintK wrote: I'd say we merge em. Egg laying milk containing cows which sit on a stick all day.
This is why i'm voting for saint for president ^^ I'd pick the noble cow to save; they are one of the major contributors to our declining ozone, but fuck it, i love a big fat ribeye steak! Even if my skin is burning off, and the world around me is dying, ill have its bloody juice running down my face! Duck pwns chicken as well anyway ^^ |
Author: | annarack [ 20 Jul 2011, 12:51 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Kangaroo steak is just as good or a nice bit of Buffalo |
Author: | ProtectMyBalls [ 20 Jul 2011, 13:02 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Buffalo is awesome! I'd be worried about my kangaroo steak jumping off the plate!!! hardy ha, harp harp !!!! ![]() *I should write jokes for xmas crackers.... |
Author: | annarack [ 20 Jul 2011, 13:06 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
You are so amooooooosing ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 20 Jul 2011, 13:07 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
[SpA]annarack wrote: You are so amooooooosing
Moosestake?
![]() |
Author: | annarack [ 20 Jul 2011, 13:08 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Oooo a nice bit of Moose Steak... yeah! |
Author: | [SpA]JuncoPartner [ 20 Jul 2011, 14:02 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
I'd deffinetly keep the cow, my world would fall apart without my bedtime milk ![]() |
Author: | Namabbi [ 20 Jul 2011, 14:14 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
I really like chickens but in this case I would choose to get rid of them. Because I use more dairy products in my cooking such as cream, milk and creme fraiche more than eggs. They say that two eggs contains enough recommended proteins per a day, and I would rather eat a whole steak/steak tartare than two eggs. ![]() |
Author: | Luis [ 20 Jul 2011, 21:08 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Have to keep the cows, or Ben and Jerry's advertising campaign would take a huge blow ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]ZombieStalin [ 20 Jul 2011, 21:10 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Simple, we kill the Chicken. Everything tastes like them anyways ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]Dolf [ 20 Jul 2011, 21:59 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
I couldn't care less about milk. I drink my coffee black, my cocoa dry and my chocola-OH SHIT! I need chocolate D: Save the cows! Eggs? Well, they go well raw with some ground beef. I really don't like "killing" the chick, too much of an effort to start scraping the bones for teh meat. Really, the only important thing chickens can be credited for is the chicken dance. Gee. And it sucks. So: Cows 2p (milk for my chocolate + meat), chickens -1p. Problem? |
Author: | [SpA]gibboss28 [ 20 Jul 2011, 22:54 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Meh, death to the cows, there's probably other animals that we can mass slaughter for food that taste better. Its just that cows got there first. Fucking cows stealing the limelight, fuck 'em! |
Author: | ProtectMyBalls [ 21 Jul 2011, 01:30 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Author: | Luis [ 21 Jul 2011, 01:40 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Author: | [SpA]Dolf [ 21 Jul 2011, 02:29 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
OK if we go that far, here is my contribution! |
Author: | ProtectMyBalls [ 21 Jul 2011, 02:44 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
cow and chicken ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]Revenge [ 21 Jul 2011, 08:39 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
SECOND QUESTION Right Would you let 13 people in the world die for diplomatic immunity for the rest of your life. These are going to be 13 very randomly picked people. however as the people are picked , the radius around you will shrink, so to start with it will be anyone in the world, to end with , it will be any one person within a mile of you , so it could be your neighbour, it could be anyone apart from you. Diplomatic immunity counts for anywhere, and in this case it means you will get away with doing everything. Everyone will know that you killed these 13 people, whoever they were, so if a 7 year old died because of you then everyone will know that. This is immunity is non-transferable, non-refundable and only ever applies to you. So 13 people for life long immunity? |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 21 Jul 2011, 08:43 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
[SpA]Revenge wrote: SECOND QUESTION
that's just disturbing Right Would you let 13 people in the world die for diplomatic immunity for the rest of your life. These are going to be 13 very randomly picked people. however as the people are picked , the radius around you will shrink, so to start with it will be anyone in the world, to end with , it will be any one person within a mile of you , so it could be your neighbour, it could be anyone apart from you. Diplomatic immunity counts for anywhere, and in this case it means you will get away with doing everything. Everyone will know that you killed these 13 people, whoever they were, so if a 7 year old died because of you then everyone will know that. This is immunity is non-transferable, non-refundable and only ever applies to you. So 13 people for life long immunity? ![]() ![]() |
Author: | ProtectMyBalls [ 21 Jul 2011, 10:50 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
silly question to be honest... as the answer is yes (we do have a over population problem) ![]() ![]() |
Author: | annarack [ 21 Jul 2011, 11:18 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Just me and Johnny Depp will do ![]() -Wonder Woman and Captain Jack Sparrow; now there's a match! |
Author: | [SpA]JuncoPartner [ 21 Jul 2011, 14:48 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Yeah, you could change the world and stuff with diplomatic immunity ![]() First thing I'm gonna do is get those fucking assholes who make us watch 10 minutes of the news in the middle of our films, pricks. |
Author: | [SpA]Dolf [ 21 Jul 2011, 15:17 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
[SpA]Revenge wrote: SECOND QUESTION
Yeah, no problem. I'd like to do it even now, but I'd be prosecuted... Can I kill a few extra? Say, maybe 99.9% of the population? That would leave us with roughly seven million people. Even that is too much... :/
Right Would you let 13 people in the world die for diplomatic immunity for the rest of your life. These are going to be 13 very randomly picked people. however as the people are picked , the radius around you will shrink, so to start with it will be anyone in the world, to end with , it will be any one person within a mile of you , so it could be your neighbour, it could be anyone apart from you. Diplomatic immunity counts for anywhere, and in this case it means you will get away with doing everything. Everyone will know that you killed these 13 people, whoever they were, so if a 7 year old died because of you then everyone will know that. This is immunity is non-transferable, non-refundable and only ever applies to you. So 13 people for life long immunity? |
Author: | [SpA]MrOrange [ 21 Jul 2011, 15:44 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
I've been working as a bank clerk/postal worker for the past month (our company does both) and I can tell you that easily 65% of the people that I have to serve every day are a detriment to our society. Either they are doing nothing at all, just leeching off of our already crippled system or they're simply too stupid to function properly in any community. My views are mostly quite left wing, but after this summer job I've definitely lost faith in humanity a bit. On topic: No, I wouldn't. Even if the random deaths wouldn't bother me all that much at first, I think I wouldn't even like to have diplomatic immunity. Morally, I wouldn't be able to commit crimes just for my own benefit. I wouldn't even put the immunity to any use. I'm happy as it is, working for my money. |
Author: | [SpA]Minimoose! [ 21 Jul 2011, 18:52 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Question of the day |
Diplomatic immunity does not make you immune to being murdered by the relatives/friends/anyone who knew you killed those 13 people, so I wouldn't do it even if I found it acceptable to kill 13 random people, which I wouldn't ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC+02:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |