SpecialAttack.net :: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman

Today I witnessed two bans of our builders.. Beenbadbones, and Sman for griefing, yes builders should not grief. But to what extent should they be punished? I believe they should've been demoted, (they were) but they were also banned, which I believe was too harsh. Some of the builders believed it was too harsh as well. I just think the bans were not necessary. Please do not punish me, for I was stating my opinion. Thank you.

_________________
Tscuz

tscuzimbrown wrote:

Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Can you please state who banned/demoted them?

Arbogeddon wrote:

Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Can you please state who banned/demoted them?

Voltblades and 2fat2furious Idk their full usernames.

Were they still greifing after they have been demoted?
Were they griefing by doing /c air?
If they were doing any of the above, they had the right to ban them.
If not, they should of just demoted them imo.

no worries - if nobody said their thoughts we'd have a pretty boring community

Author:	tscuzimbrown [ 07 Jun 2012, 22:44 ]
Post subject:	Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Today I witnessed two bans of our builders.. Beenbadbones, and Sman for griefing, yes builders should not grief. But to what extent should they be punished? I believe they should've been demoted, (they were) but they were also banned, which I believe was too harsh. Some of the builders believed it was too harsh as well. I just think the bans were not necessary. Please do not punish me, for I was stating my opinion. Thank you. _________________ Tscuz

Author:	Arbogeddon [ 07 Jun 2012, 22:51 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
tscuzimbrown wrote: Today I witnessed two bans of our builders.. Beenbadbones, and Sman for griefing, yes builders should not grief. But to what extent should they be punished? I believe they should've been demoted, (they were) but they were also banned, which I believe was too harsh. Some of the builders believed it was too harsh as well. I just think the bans were not necessary. Please do not punish me, for I was stating my opinion. Thank you. _________________ Tscuz Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Can you please state who banned/demoted them?

Author:	tscuzimbrown [ 07 Jun 2012, 22:54 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Arbogeddon wrote: tscuzimbrown wrote: Today I witnessed two bans of our builders.. Beenbadbones, and Sman for griefing, yes builders should not grief. But to what extent should they be punished? I believe they should've been demoted, (they were) but they were also banned, which I believe was too harsh. Some of the builders believed it was too harsh as well. I just think the bans were not necessary. Please do not punish me, for I was stating my opinion. Thank you. _________________ Tscuz Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Can you please state who banned/demoted them? Voltblades and 2fat2furious Idk their full usernames.

Author:	Arbogeddon [ 07 Jun 2012, 22:55 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
tscuzimbrown wrote: Arbogeddon wrote: Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Can you please state who banned/demoted them? Voltblades and 2fat2furious Idk their full usernames. Alright

Author:	NinjaAssasin1234 [ 07 Jun 2012, 23:05 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Were they still greifing after they have been demoted? Were they griefing by doing /c air? If they were doing any of the above, they had the right to ban them. If not, they should of just demoted them imo.

SpecialAttack.net https://forum.specialattack.net/

Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=13540	Page 1 of 1

Author:	tscuzimbrown [ 07 Jun 2012, 23:08 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
NinjaAssasin1234 wrote: Were they still greifing after they have been demoted? Were they griefing by doing /c air? If they were doing any of the above, they had the right to ban them. If not, they should of just demoted them imo. they were just greifing no /c air

Author:	Voltblades [ 07 Jun 2012, 23:12 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Actually, Beenbadbones had used /c air to grief, and then sman started to insult us after his demotion, which is when 2fat banned him.

Author:	Gamma_Metroid [ 07 Jun 2012, 23:18 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
They were banned by two responsible staffers, and if the builders think they were unjust bans, they can use the appeal forum. You could always bring it up with whoever did the banning in-game to ask about their reasoning as well. Believe me, it's easy to miss some things that ops+ pick up on.

Author:	tscuzimbrown [ 07 Jun 2012, 23:20 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Oh okay, I just wanted to post my opinions, I don't want to start anything, sorry.

Author:	Gamma_Metroid [ 07 Jun 2012, 23:23 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
no worries - if nobody said their thoughts we'd have a pretty boring community

Author:	[SpA]Dolf [ 07 Jun 2012, 23:39 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Gamma_Metroid wrote: no worries - if nobody said their thoughts we'd have a pretty boring community Feels Hafnium, man.

Author:	herrsuper [ 25 Jun 2012, 02:35 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
lets post this stuff in the related subforums next time

Author:	zXPoison [ 03 Jul 2012, 20:36 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Why am I seeing this only now?.. Moving on not only been was c-airing upon undoing sman we've noticed a big amount of blocks on him as well , so he was most probably using /c air as well or somehow they both edited 10k+ blocks by clicking.. Initially they where demoted and frozen , starting to insult us and our realization of them using /c air to grief made us decide they should be banned. Also as said earlier if they think they where banned unfairly they should make a appeal..

Author:	Arbogeddon [ 03 Jul 2012, 20:54 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
beep bop boop

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC+02:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Author:	zXPoison [ 03 Jul 2012, 21:43 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Arbogeddon wrote: Necro Much? Necro?

Author:	[SpA]heldplayer [ 03 Jul 2012, 21:57 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
Arbogeddon wrote: Necro Much? Totally not a necro, the last post isn't even a month old. You need to learn when it IS or IS NOT a necro.

Author:	[SpA]Pizzaman194 [ 08 Jul 2012, 04:54 ]
Post subject:	Re: Uunnecessary bans of Beenbadbones and Sman
tscuzimbrown wrote: Today I witnessed two bans of our builders.. Beenbadbones, and Sman for griefing, yes builders should not grief. But to what extent should they be punished? I believe they should've been demoted, (they were) but they were also banned, which I believe was too harsh. Some of the builders believed it was too harsh as well. I just think the bans were not necessary. Please do not punish me, for I was stating my opinion. Thank you. _________________ Tscuz Hey, don't think that you aren't allowed to voice your opinions here.