SpecialAttack.net https://forum.specialattack.net/ |
|
What server do you want? https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=1772 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 07 Jan 2008, 21:18 ] |
Post subject: | What server do you want? |
Thanks to Antz we have room for another server. Now we're thinking about what we want to set up there. We have thought about TF2 and CSS so far. If anyone els got some suggestions your free to post them. For CSS: We will also require idea's on what to install on the server and such for mods or plugins. |
Author: | Aleksander [ 07 Jan 2008, 21:28 ] |
Post subject: | Re: What server do you want? |
Um, CS 1.6 obviously ![]() ![]() I feel obliged to mention NS (Natural Selection) as well. In my opinion that's the best HL mod, and I used to play it alot on public before. You have all probably tried it, but you should try it some more ![]() |
Author: | Quattro [ 07 Jan 2008, 21:33 ] |
Post subject: | |
u dont take a chance at a BF2 server again saint? ![]() well i vote CSS caus i think 2, TF2 servers is enought ![]() |
Author: | Dgbhunter [ 07 Jan 2008, 21:50 ] |
Post subject: | |
any chance to bring cs 1.6 back? |
Author: | Quattro [ 07 Jan 2008, 21:59 ] |
Post subject: | |
1,6 is dead, understand!? ![]() |
Author: | Aleksander [ 07 Jan 2008, 22:01 ] |
Post subject: | |
lol... all the fags and n00bs went over to Source, but it's a fact that all the pros stayed on 1.6. I might start playing 1.6 again (definitely if you set up a server), but I won't bother trying to adapt my aim to Source. It's just too different and stupid. |
Author: | [SpA]Ruscher [ 07 Jan 2008, 22:17 ] |
Post subject: | |
Css |
Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 08 Jan 2008, 00:39 ] |
Post subject: | |
CSS is much improved now - the spec mode is useless for spray, but the game is actually very playable - and I been playing CS since Loooooonnnng time..... (older and older by the minute here ![]() Nice to have a choice of game aswell, may also attract different types of players to SpA... |
Author: | [SpA]cookye [ 08 Jan 2008, 07:05 ] |
Post subject: | |
cs 1.6 ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]Jury [ 08 Jan 2008, 07:47 ] |
Post subject: | |
I don't play CSS but I think that it would be a good idea to have also something else in the menu than just TF2. |
Author: | Xurreal [ 08 Jan 2008, 09:46 ] |
Post subject: | |
Conformity at it's finest folks, with enough people saying the sky is green people would believe it. Same with CS:Source. In fact, there is nothing inherently wrong with source. I have seen various complaints that the head hitbox is "XBAWK HUEG!111" to buggy netcode, I personally have not experienced any problem with source. The only gripe I am have about it is that when crouching your point of view is from the gun instead out of the model's head. If you like 1.6, that's fine with me, it's still a great game but the offhanded comment of how CSS is for fags and noobs is not needed. |
Author: | [SpA]Hunth [ 08 Jan 2008, 09:53 ] |
Post subject: | |
[SpA]Aleksander wrote: lol...
thank you thank you /me bows all the fags and n00bs went over to Source, but it's a fact that all the pros stayed on 1.6. I might start playing 1.6 again (definitely if you set up a server), but I won't bother trying to adapt my aim to Source. It's just too different and stupid. ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 08 Jan 2008, 10:16 ] |
Post subject: | |
You people gotta stop "fearing change"... Time's move, games move, systems move. If everyone stuck with what we knew, we'd all be sitting talking about our "PONG" clan on an Atari 2600... We'd all be driving steam engined cars and we'd be wearing raw animal skins... ![]() (i may have exaggerated slightly...). |
Author: | [SpA]Agni [ 08 Jan 2008, 10:20 ] |
Post subject: | |
PONG clan, now THERE is an idea!! I could also nominate duckhunt on newer platform, if you guys are up to it. tbh lets host Q1TF and see whats happening on that server. I tried it after like 6 years and it was scary as fuck. The thing that I miss from that game is proper FOV, the one thats available in TF2 is just too narrow. I would lave to have my good old faithful 130/75/40 configuration in game. ( sniping would be so much easyer) |
Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 08 Jan 2008, 10:21 ] |
Post subject: | |
130, lol - u tart ![]() Duckhunt though... I'm with ya ![]() |
Author: | Aleksander [ 08 Jan 2008, 11:30 ] |
Post subject: | |
I'd rather play Pong wars with you than Source... |
Author: | [SpA]Jury [ 08 Jan 2008, 14:07 ] |
Post subject: | |
Nethack FTW! |
Author: | [SpA]SonnyBlack [ 08 Jan 2008, 15:53 ] |
Post subject: | |
CS 1.6 ![]() ![]() ![]() ... |
Author: | [SpA]Ruscher [ 08 Jan 2008, 16:15 ] |
Post subject: | |
[SpA]Xurreal wrote: Conformity at it's finest folks, with enough people saying the sky is green people would believe it.
So true! I played 1.6 aswell and now i play css only because its just newer and better, i can't stand dumb people who r like "ZOMG HITBOX R SHITZZ LOLZZ!!!!" Because fact is they saw it at some of her friends or on a video and noticed a maybe unrealistic kill and then they r like "ZOMG NOOB GAME" but they never tried it, GUYS: YOU STILL HAVE TO AIM TO OWN! It's not you run around and spray some bullets out and got like 81274891894729 headshotkills.Same with CS:Source. In fact, there is nothing inherently wrong with source. I have seen various complaints that the head hitbox is "XBAWK HUEG!111" to buggy netcode, I personally have not experienced any problem with source. The only gripe I am have about it is that when crouching your point of view is from the gun instead out of the model's head. If you like 1.6, that's fine with me, it's still a great game but the offhanded comment of how CSS is for fags and noobs is not needed. I also don't say that COD4 sucks only because you can shoot through every wall. |
Author: | [SpA]Bucky [ 08 Jan 2008, 16:37 ] |
Post subject: | |
x wing versus tie fighter for the win guys! |
Author: | Quattro [ 08 Jan 2008, 16:45 ] |
Post subject: | |
shooting through walls is realistic with powerful rifles etc. get up an CSS server ![]() when i was used for 1,6 the aim was a bit weird maybe but u get used to it fast and its even some graphics in CSS which 1,6 aint got ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 08 Jan 2008, 17:21 ] |
Post subject: | |
[SpA]Bucky wrote: x wing versus tie fighter for the win guys!
Now we're talking!!!! X-wing for the fuckin win babe!
|
Author: | [SpA]Ruscher [ 08 Jan 2008, 18:04 ] |
Post subject: | |
X-wing sounds like one of these old 2D based space ship shooters ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 08 Jan 2008, 18:17 ] |
Post subject: | |
[SpA]Ruscher wrote: X-wing sounds like one of these old 2D based space ship shooters
Its actually a 3d space fighter, you fly one of the availible star fighters like the X-wing, Tie-advanced, Y-wing etc, and you need to complete fighter missions or good old dog fights. Its been the best flight game i ever played.
![]() |
Author: | Quattro [ 08 Jan 2008, 18:29 ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() |
Author: | Aleksander [ 08 Jan 2008, 18:51 ] |
Post subject: | |
I was never able to install it on my brother's 133mhz, so I've never played it ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]Geylani [ 09 Jan 2008, 05:33 ] |
Post subject: | |
There are 3 TF2 servers already And I think I want to see some blood with some real time guns, ak-41 and m4a1 and specially my bloody knife! I really miss my knife. |
Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 09 Jan 2008, 16:24 ] |
Post subject: | |
[SpA]Geylani wrote: There are 3 TF2 servers already
Spoken like a gentleman And I think I want to see some blood with some real time guns, ak-41 and m4a1 and specially my bloody knife! I really miss my knife. ![]() I 100% agree... TF2 is an amazing game, but CSS is really fcking good aswell now, and the newer versions of some of the maps are incredible (Nuke, Prodigy and a few others). |
Author: | Aleksander [ 09 Jan 2008, 16:45 ] |
Post subject: | |
Yeah, it's a shame they made the rest of the game so fucked up, so we will have to play 1.6 instead ![]() |
Author: | Beserker [ 09 Jan 2008, 16:58 ] |
Post subject: | |
CSS: Regular server. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC+02:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |