| SpecialAttack.net https://forum.specialattack.net/ |
|
| tfc_well, your thoughts? https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=1833 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 26 Jan 2008, 14:14 ] |
| Post subject: | tfc_well, your thoughts? |
I think the tfc version of well stinks. Its boring. Feels like playing battlefield2 with no cars. Your busy 80% of your time walking to the other side. What do you people think? |
|
| Author: | Quattro [ 26 Jan 2008, 14:27 ] |
| Post subject: | |
aint tested it yet so dont remove it plz |
|
| Author: | [SpA]cookye [ 26 Jan 2008, 15:37 ] |
| Post subject: | |
i think its better than the cp version |
|
| Author: | Aleksander [ 26 Jan 2008, 15:51 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Will test on monday. |
|
| Author: | [SpA]lacop [ 26 Jan 2008, 19:55 ] |
| Post subject: | |
lot of walking ... cp version is better imho, more action |
|
| Author: | Quattro [ 27 Jan 2008, 00:47 ] |
| Post subject: | |
cp version is funnier agreed, ctf version is so fucking booring |
|
| Author: | Ardizt [ 28 Jan 2008, 09:35 ] |
| Post subject: | |
It aint no good, too long distance between intels. |
|
| Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 28 Jan 2008, 10:14 ] |
| Post subject: | |
* First post updated with voteoption, please cast your votes |
|
| Author: | [SpA]cookye [ 28 Jan 2008, 10:56 ] |
| Post subject: | |
keep |
|
| Author: | Quattro [ 28 Jan 2008, 11:14 ] |
| Post subject: | |
gotta say keep, quite funny to sit and wank on the sentry in the intel room, got 13 kills when afk |
|
| Author: | [SpA]demm [ 28 Jan 2008, 11:20 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I played a long round on it yesterday but I still haven't made up my mind whether it's good or not. It was kind of a stale game, where the other team built a lot of sentries in their spawn area and my team could not get past them. My team couldn't take out the sentries either, because the engis where pretty good (moPP and nick) and since our engis built sentries right outside of the spawn area nobody in either team was able to cap the intel. On the one hand, it kinda sucked, but on the other hand it was good, because all the action was condensed into a really small area and since we had teleporters, we didn't have the long walking distances. Currently I'm leaning more towards removing it, but I think you should keep it at least another week so we can test it more thoroughly. |
|
| Author: | [SpA]FreeStyler [ 28 Jan 2008, 12:49 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hi demm <3 Well delete, The map is way to big and 2 boring |
|
| Author: | Inty [ 29 Jan 2008, 16:24 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
Map sucks... nuff said |
|
| Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 29 Jan 2008, 19:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
Not tried yet, will try later tonight or tomorrow early... No vote till then... |
|
| Author: | crash [ 29 Jan 2008, 20:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
I think this map is just too big for ctf map |
|
| Author: | Aleksander [ 29 Jan 2008, 20:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
I haven't tried it yet, but come on, we've kept 2fort in the mapcycle, and nobody likes that... |
|
| Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 29 Jan 2008, 21:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
[SpA]Aleksander wrote: I haven't tried it yet, but come on, we've kept 2fort in the mapcycle, and nobody likes that...
lmao |
|
| Author: | Quattro [ 29 Jan 2008, 21:25 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
remove my keep and go for remove |
|
| Author: | The Reverend [ 03 Feb 2008, 05:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
I may be a simple man of God (Please note: This may not reflect the truth) but I personally find the CTF maps in TF2 rather boring. And well is too big. So I say give it the chop. |
|
| Author: | Aleksander [ 03 Feb 2008, 13:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
It was OK. I say leave it for now. |
|
| Author: | [SpA]demm [ 03 Feb 2008, 17:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
I've played it several times now and I have to say that, though the matches can be fun, they tend to be less interesting than on cp_well. That said, I'd much rather remove ctf_2fort form the mapcycle than ctf_well, since 2fort sucks much more! |
|
| Author: | [SpA]demm [ 03 Mar 2008, 09:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
i'm reviving this old post because i feel that our mapcycle is too short. there a so few maps, so i once again vote to include ctf_well in the mapcycle. my old argument still stands: it's better than ctf_2fort! |
|
| Author: | Magisk [ 03 Mar 2008, 10:26 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
Enable birthday mod on ctf maps so everyone gets in a better mood, makes for better games! |
|
| Author: | [SpA]SonnyBlack [ 03 Mar 2008, 10:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
cp > ctf Remove it. |
|
| Author: | [SpA]lacop [ 03 Mar 2008, 13:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
[SpA]Magisk wrote: Enable birthday mod on ctf maps so everyone gets in a better mood, makes for better games!
thats good idea, i love birthday mod ... but afaik this would move SpA servers to custom tab :/
|
|
| Author: | [SpA]demm [ 03 Mar 2008, 13:21 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
[SpA]lacop wrote: thats good idea, i love birthday mod ... but afaik this would move SpA servers to custom tab :/
the spa server would already be in the custom tab if it weren't for a plugin i wrote, because we have an increased player count and decreased spawn times.so we could enable birthday mode if you want to or i could integrate it in the spa points system, so you could start a party for a few points |
|
| Author: | Magisk [ 03 Mar 2008, 13:35 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
[SpA]demm wrote: [SpA]lacop wrote: thats good idea, i love birthday mod ... but afaik this would move SpA servers to custom tab :/
the spa server would already be in the custom tab if it weren't for a plugin i wrote, because we have an increased player count and decreased spawn times.so we could enable birthday mode if you want to or i could integrate it in the spy points system, so you could start a party for a few points |
|
| Author: | Crovax20 [ 03 Mar 2008, 14:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
Personally I don't find 2fort bad. I prefer it over CTF_Well anyways. The only gripe I have with 2 fort as well as CTF_well is that it usually becomes a rather stale game. But in my opinion this is mostly because of the amount of engineers and the lack of proper coördination. I always have loads of fun on 2fort, but I don't even bother with the flag because its proper suicide |
|
| Author: | Republic [ 04 Mar 2008, 11:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tfc_well, your thoughts? |
I quite like it. I think the problem is that no one really likes new maps at the start coz they're not used to them. I heard Badlands really slagged off the first few days I played it, I didn't really like it at first, got to say I love it now. All we are Saaayyyiiing is give maps a chance. tin hat on = 1 |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC+01:00 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|