468th post.sorce blows?
hammy dont do this:D
| SpecialAttack.net https://forum.specialattack.net/ |
|
| Question https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=437 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 13 Sep 2006, 16:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Question |
How populair is CS:Source? Is it worth to get a CS:Source server? And what CS:Source mods/plugins are populair? I'm thinking about this, because slowely but surely, how much i hate to say it, CS 1.6 is dying.... |
|
| Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 13 Sep 2006, 16:05 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Souce is REAL popular! For an example, have a look at all the dumb servers. It's only the Source servers that ALWAYS have people on them... I think it's really pretty, but the weapon balance is bollox. However, it's still improving and they're making some fundamental changes to it every month. It's definately worth having a server, dunno about mods though. There's a LOT of interesting looking ones, but a lot of them look like "novelty" mods... i.e Play them for a week, then get bored, try a new one, repeat, repeat... I'm prepared to move over if necessary, so no problems from me. |
|
| Author: | PsychoticRaver [ 13 Sep 2006, 18:03 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think CS1.6 and Source will become more popular once 'ProMod' is released. I don't know to much about this, but it does seem promising and it's getting alot of support from practically all online gaming communities. |
|
| Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 13 Sep 2006, 18:06 ] |
| Post subject: | |
PsychoticRaver wrote: I think CS1.6 and Source will become more popular once 'ProMod' is released.
ProMod? Got some more info about that ?(links or so)
I don't know to much about this, but it does seem promising and it's getting alot of support from practically all online gaming communities. |
|
| Author: | Dgbhunter [ 13 Sep 2006, 19:21 ] |
| Post subject: | |
css suck a bit time..... |
|
| Author: | PsychoticRaver [ 13 Sep 2006, 20:21 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Here you go SaintK. http://www.cspromod.com. |
|
| Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 13 Sep 2006, 20:39 ] |
| Post subject: | |
PsychoticRaver wrote: |
|
| Author: | PsychoticRaver [ 14 Sep 2006, 13:10 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah, from what i can gather, it's taking all the best bits and putting it into one game, or something. |
|
| Author: | No_namE [ 14 Sep 2006, 14:24 ] |
| Post subject: | |
cs will never die btw i dont know any1 who play cs source in real |
|
| Author: | Botty [ 14 Sep 2006, 15:02 ] |
| Post subject: | |
For those of you who have source: Is it worth buying? some people say it's just shit and others say that its really good... Want to know how it looks also, so if you got any nice source screenie, please post it somewhere or send me it in a PM or something.. (btw. sry for that I havent been really active lately, got load to do in school to keep up with the rest of the class... Electrics are pretty hard) U I x R |
|
| Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 14 Sep 2006, 15:41 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have source, and i have some problems with it, but i think thats because my hardware cant cope with it. So i wont judge untill i have a decent PC. |
|
| Author: | PsychoticRaver [ 14 Sep 2006, 16:14 ] |
| Post subject: | |
The PC i use can't really handle Source nicely as i'd like it to. I have not played Source in fucking ages now, lol. |
|
| Author: | BrokenDreams [ 14 Sep 2006, 20:05 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I won't play source. |
|
| Author: | No_namE [ 14 Sep 2006, 20:24 ] |
| Post subject: | |
i played it once and i noticed it has many bugs like hmm someone bleeding from leg but it writes he died from hs:P |
|
| Author: | Hamburek [ 14 Sep 2006, 20:52 ] |
| Post subject: | |
[SpA]BrokenDreams wrote: I won't play source.
me neither
|
|
| Author: | [SpA]th3-mute [ 14 Sep 2006, 21:48 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'll post some 1280x1024 screenies for ya tomorrow if u like... It IS very VERY pretty. Some of the guns totally pwn, some of the maps do aswell. *BUT* some of the guns and maps suck so hard they almost completely ruin it... Also lots of people get graphics lag. I'd recommend trying it somewhere first... See what you think. I've played enough of it, to enjoy it, and my PC copes with it fine, but it's not the polished piece of multiplayer goodness that 1.6 is, even if it sh1ts all over it from a great height in the "prettiness" factor... |
|
| Author: | PsychoticRaver [ 16 Sep 2006, 13:19 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Source will always look better than CS1.6, obviously, lol. But, i think this shows that great graphics does not mean great gameplay. |
|
| Author: | Hamburek [ 16 Sep 2006, 13:19 ] |
| Post subject: | |
well put ; ) |
|
| Author: | BrokenDreams [ 16 Sep 2006, 22:33 ] |
| Post subject: | |
100th post. source blows. |
|
| Author: | No_namE [ 17 Sep 2006, 00:22 ] |
| Post subject: | |
468th post.sorce blows? hammy dont do this:D |
|
| Author: | Hamburek [ 17 Sep 2006, 01:14 ] |
| Post subject: | |
683 : > source blows : ) |
|
| Author: | No_namE [ 17 Sep 2006, 14:07 ] |
| Post subject: | |
knew it 
|
|
| Author: | Hamburek [ 17 Sep 2006, 18:52 ] |
| Post subject: | |
yeah cudnt help myself : D |
|
| Author: | No_namE [ 17 Sep 2006, 20:31 ] |
| Post subject: | |
i know it when something is stronger than u
|
|
| Author: | [SpA]Geylani [ 29 Sep 2006, 04:06 ] |
| Post subject: | |
tbh source ownz! i played after i found a valvecafepc account for some days and it got deleten already.what i can say is u can have 64 players at a time, bit crowded but it ownz, great graphics etc. and there are too less mods atm, and warcraft mod at source sux like hell! so.. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC+02:00 |
|
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |
|