Multi-Gaming Community
It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 14:25

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next

Make serv 3 32 slots?
yes 35%  35%  [ 16 ]
no 43%  43%  [ 20 ]
Don't mind 22%  22%  [ 10 ]
Total votes: 46
Author Message
cz 
 Post subject: More = better?
PostPosted: 21 Dec 2008, 23:50 
Offline
Community slut (13473)
User avatar
I am thinking about making server 3 32 slots. Personally i like the more chaos the better!

Please note this vote is *only* about server 3! Servers 1 and 2 will remain untouched.

Please cast your vote!


Top
   
nl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 21 Dec 2008, 23:52 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (2546)
User avatar
eww no.. that's not chaos.. that's a contest of finding a spot to stand~


Top
   
lu 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 21 Dec 2008, 23:54 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1548)
User avatar
Yay, might be fun!
I voted yes! 8)

_________________
Ze Ãœbermensch


Top
   
pl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 00:02 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1715)
User avatar
Thats not a good idea, since good 32 slot servers require proper maps - on most standard map thats just demoman spamfest all the time :/


Top
   
cz 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 00:10 
Offline
Community slut (13473)
User avatar
Bartg wrote:
Thats not a good idea, since good 32 slot servers require proper maps - on most standard map thats just demoman spamfest all the time :/

We could regulate this with the classlimiter plugin which runs on our servers.


Top
   
pl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 00:37 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1715)
User avatar
2-3 demomans is a good amount for 32 slots, and 4 pyros ;)


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 01:48 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (5288)
User avatar
Well one demoman can make a map a spam fest, as i did on steel today :/ But anyway, i dont mind. Do you think there's any chance of a no-crit server? Or is that not ever going to happen? :wink:

_________________
a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a pig


Top
   
pl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 02:16 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1715)
User avatar
Afair there was a no-crit server and it was empty all the time ;]


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 02:24 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (5288)
User avatar
Awww man that sucks, I love playing without crits, makes the game so much more skill based :(

_________________
a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a pig


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 07:27 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1073)
User avatar
Yeah why not, as long as the other 2 servers stay the same it should not be a problem

_________________
You'll Feel A Little Prick


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 09:22 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (3493)
User avatar
as long as they don't replace the current servers and that you think there'll be enough demand for them, go for it.
but can we not have 2fort in rotation? I think everyone's agreed it's the most boring map in the world. :<

I'm also up for a nocrits server, as I (sometimes) actually enjoy that more :p

_________________
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: true genius
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: doesn't make sense
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: till you're senseless


Top
   
nl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 09:26 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (2546)
User avatar
map changed to turbine yesterday I think.. and we lost about 10 people :(


Top
   
se 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 09:51 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1168)
User avatar
32 players :mrgreen: = on map change more people left( to kill :lol: )

_________________
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving."


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 09:52 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (5288)
User avatar
I find that I'm always playing dustbowl and goldrush so now I just spam SpA points whenever I'm on to get rid of them. Turbine, Fastlane, Well and Badlands are better maps by far :(

_________________
a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a pig


Top
   
nl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 10:12 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (2359)
User avatar
No, because i know you will want us to fill up that server. And then all my buddies are playing on that crappy 32 slot server and then I get to choose between playing on a 24 players server or play on the spamtastic 32 player one with my buddies

_________________
Da boyz need themselves a Nob they do


Top
   
se 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 11:33 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1829)
User avatar
I dont care tbh, theres no big difference between 14v14 and 16v16.

_________________
All roads may lead to Rome, but all Wikipedia pages eventually get you to the Third Reich. - m3n


Top
   
se 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 13:39 
Offline
Likes to type... (284)
User avatar
Isn't Well in the map rotation anymore? A long time since I played that.

On the topic at hand though, I don't really mind.


Top
   
cz 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 13:57 
Offline
Community slut (13473)
User avatar
Loke wrote:
Isn't Well in the map rotation anymore? A long time since I played that.

On the topic at hand though, I don't really mind.

It is. We have a day and night cycle, its there between 10 AM en 10PM


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 14:19 
Offline
Geek (993)
I don't mind if it's only server 3, voted yes. :P


Top
   
pl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 16:23 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1715)
User avatar
Quote:
I find that I'm always playing dustbowl and goldrush so now I just spam SpA points whenever I'm on to get rid of them. Turbine, Fastlane, Well and Badlands are better maps by far
I think the game has been for over a year, so most players who know the game plays 4-5 standard maps just like every other game ( cs, battlefields, call of duty etc. ), so the server will empty or maps like steel, turbine, not to mention any not standard map. Ya know, pro players cant let them die because they dont know every inch of a map ;)


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 18:26 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (5288)
User avatar
Bartg wrote:
Ya know, pro players cant let them die because they dont know every inch of a map ;)
? :| Which maps are we talking of here ^^

_________________
a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a pig


Top
   
pl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 18:36 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1715)
User avatar
All custom maps ;)


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2008, 19:05 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (5288)
User avatar
You don't need to know a map to kill on it, just sit near a door and plant stickies on it, set up a sentry or camp it with a heavy/soldier and your set for the whole game, especially on 14vs14.

I actually played on the custom map server quite a lot when I was in Grr!, some of the maps are pretty fun, especially playing geothermal as a soldier.

_________________
a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a pig


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2008, 09:34 
Offline
Geek (778)
User avatar
"why not?"

Still got server 1 and 2, and if you don't like 32 players don't play it.

_________________
Computer is fixed. That is all.


Top
   
nl 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2008, 10:32 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (2359)
User avatar
MikeDH wrote:
"why not?"

Still got server 1 and 2, and if you don't like 32 players don't play it.
And what happens when the server is empty? Saint spams us invites to fill it up/we join to fill it up, all my buddies I like to play with go onto that server and I can choose between the spamtastic server with my buddies on it or a normal server without any buddies.

32 players just sucks, its way too spammy. I dunno who here enjoys getting grenade/rocket spammed and chokepoints but I sure don't. Its simply an exercise in frustration at that point, playing scout and spy is nearly pointless as well because with so many people around its just pointless you will run into someone every second. The impact of larger server on the class balance is profound and thats why I would be against it. Spy, scout, pyro, suffer the most from this, since they need to be close range and can't resort to standing far away spamming instapwn rockets/grenades nor have the health to get up close like the heavy.

More does not equal better. At a certain point more just becomes an obstacle, think about it like this. 1 barman behind the bar can serve 5 spamembers relatively fast. 2 barmans can do 12 relatively fast, 3 can do 20 relatively fast, 4 can only do 24 relatively fast since they will get in eachothers way. There is a reason valve official number is max 24 players. After that point the gameplay just starts degrading too much and too many stalemates will appear.

_________________
Da boyz need themselves a Nob they do


Top
   
se 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2008, 12:44 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1829)
User avatar
Server #1 = 24slots
Server #2 = 28slots
Server #3 = 32slots

What about this?

_________________
All roads may lead to Rome, but all Wikipedia pages eventually get you to the Third Reich. - m3n


Top
   
ro 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2008, 14:46 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (3017)
Well, I'd never play on a 32 player server because of the spamfest. There's little for me to add after Crovax's post, and I agree with him.

_________________
Comfortably Numb


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2008, 14:52 
Offline
Geek (778)
User avatar
Don't forget engi, it's a struggle to keep anything up.

Meh, see how it goes.

_________________
Computer is fixed. That is all.


Top
   
gb 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2008, 19:39 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (5288)
User avatar
I want to change my vote to it not happening, I hate spam fests (Unless im doing it to make a point about steel :mrgreen:). It will probably be ok for demo's and soldiers since they do large splash damage, but for other classes it will be to much spam. (Even heavies with medics will be boned against all the demo's and soldiers)

_________________
a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a bird in a pig


Top
   
no 
 Post subject: Re: More = better?
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2009, 09:53 
Offline
Likes to type... (261)
User avatar
Did this ever happen? I find anything over 24 players to be a bit overkill, so I voted a big fat no.
Would be fun to have a server with 8vs8, no crits and maps like granary, badlands, well etc.
I know at least one certain not so big moose who probably agrees with me. :)

_________________
but mastar cheef is a pretty cool guy eh kills aleins and doesnt afraid of anythign


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 Next

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited