Wat.
You knew this one was coming. Do I really need to recount everything that's wrong with Vista
Yeah?
-- its bloat, its slowness,
Maybe... you're not supposed to use it on a slow machine? Just maybe?
its hardware and software incompatibilities,
Yeah let's support legacy hardware and old software for the next 10 years. And that's why many companies decided to downgrade - because their programs are incompatible or have problems with Vista. People are just waaaay to confident that Vista (or windows in general) is compatible with everything - well it's not. And that's one thing you should consider when you buy vista for a computer that's not brand new.
its high cost, its confusing versions, its security fumbles and other ineptitudes?
Operating system that costs as much as 2 modern games. And if you don't get the OEM version but buy a standalone version for your ancient piece of 01100011011100100110000101110000, then you're an idiot. Upgrading to vista is just retarded - buying a new computer with vista is logical.
Also, security fumbles? What? I've had no problems with security and the updates are being shat out so often it's almost annoying.
Or how about the fact that several of its vital features wouldn't work on computers bearing a "Vista Capable" sticker? Let me share with you one early "review" of Vista:
"I chose my laptop (a Sony TX770P) because it had the Vista logo and was pretty disappointed that it not only wouldn't run [Aero], but more important wouldn't run [Windows] Movie Maker. ... Now I have a $2,100 e-mail machine."
http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/Window ... 11033.mspx
Oh no, the
INTEL GRAPHICS MEDIA ACCELERATOR 900 can't run Aero or windows movie maker. I can really see how that is not completely logical.
