SpecialAttack.net https://forum.specialattack.net/ |
|
Last years bandwidth https://forum.specialattack.net/viewtopic.php?t=9308 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 03 Jan 2011, 10:04 ] |
Post subject: | Last years bandwidth |
I've had a look at last years bandwidth usage, and as most people here know, I like stats other then ingame related stats. So, what did you lot use last year on pure gaming bandwidth? 30.000 GigaByte! 13.000GB of this was used up by the Minecraft servers and some 17.000GB was used by all other gameservers (TF2, L4D(2) etc). |
Author: | Ollieboy [ 03 Jan 2011, 10:22 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
I apologise on behalf of Minecraft. Donation incoming. |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 03 Jan 2011, 10:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Some more stats; We had 280.000 unique visitors on our forums and frontpage, generating some 2.000.000 page views. |
Author: | [SpA]MrOrange [ 03 Jan 2011, 10:54 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
280.000 unique visitors! Slowly on our way to word domination ![]() |
Author: | Ollieboy [ 03 Jan 2011, 10:58 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
0.004% of the world has visited this website!! 0.014% of people who have internet have visited!! |
Author: | annarack [ 03 Jan 2011, 10:58 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Stat whore ![]() [SpA]SaintK wrote: 13.000GB of this was used up by the Minecraft servers and some 17.000GB was used by all other gameservers (TF2, L4D(2) etc).
At least Minecraft haven't completely taken us over then ![]() ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]don_don_don [ 03 Jan 2011, 12:06 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
[SpA]annarack wrote: At least Minecraft haven't completely taken us over then ![]() ![]() Don't jinx it ![]() But wow 17.000gb is pretty crazy, silly minecraft people ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]Minimoose! [ 03 Jan 2011, 14:51 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
I like stats, except when I have to do stuff with them. |
Author: | [SpA]Relentless [ 03 Jan 2011, 15:59 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
[SpA]annarack wrote: Stat whore
Yeah, if you don't consider that Minecraft joined in the middle of the year and is only one game, whereas "all other gameservers" are more games and still just got barely over 50% bandwidth.
![]() [SpA]SaintK wrote: 13.000GB of this was used up by the Minecraft servers and some 17.000GB was used by all other gameservers (TF2, L4D(2) etc).
At least Minecraft haven't completely taken us over then ![]() ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 03 Jan 2011, 16:06 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
[SpA]Relentless wrote: [SpA]annarack wrote: Stat whore
Yeah, if you don't consider that Minecraft joined in the middle of the year and is only one game, whereas "all other gameservers" are more games and still just got barely over 50% bandwidth.![]() At least Minecraft haven't completely taken us over then ![]() ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]Bucky [ 03 Jan 2011, 16:11 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Makes you wonder what covert ops the minecrafters are running as those pixels shouldn't generate much traffic, right? ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 03 Jan 2011, 16:11 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
More graphs: Mumble usage slowly growing throughout the year, with a peak of 45 users at the same time near the end of the year; |
Author: | annarack [ 03 Jan 2011, 16:55 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
You can show me pretty pictures but you're still a stat whore ![]() |
Author: | [SpA]SaintK [ 03 Jan 2011, 17:13 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
[SpA]annarack wrote: You can show me pretty pictures but you're still a stat whore
Look who's talkin ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Lim-Dul [ 03 Jan 2011, 18:26 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
[SpA]Bucky wrote: Makes you wonder what covert ops the minecrafters are running as those pixels shouldn't generate much traffic, right? :mrgreen:
Indeed Minecraft SHOULDN'T take up so much bandwidth but tell that to Notch. ;-)People are bending over backwards to save bandwidth but are bound by his retarded protocol specifications... |
Author: | [SpA]Bucky [ 03 Jan 2011, 20:37 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Ey, keep the money coming ![]() |
Author: | Ollieboy [ 04 Jan 2011, 01:07 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
I blame Minecraft for the large mumble-ness too. A few nights ago there were roughly 15, maybe even almost 20 as my overlay was huge, on the Minecraft channel for quite a while using all your bandwidths and stuff. |
Author: | Lim-Dul [ 04 Jan 2011, 02:48 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Mumble uses close to no bandwidth... It also doesn't run off the same machine. :-P |
Author: | Ollieboy [ 04 Jan 2011, 03:01 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
..I still blame Minecraft. |
Author: | Lim-Dul [ 04 Jan 2011, 03:09 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Well yeah - everybody does, it's not really up for debate. ;-) |
Author: | [SpA]Relentless [ 04 Jan 2011, 11:36 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
![]() |
Author: | SomethingAmazing [ 04 Jan 2011, 12:58 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Don't you just LOVE blocks? |
Author: | annarack [ 04 Jan 2011, 16:39 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Changed it for you coz that's how I read it... SomethingAmazing wrote: Don't you just LOVE bollocks?
|
Author: | [SpA]Minimoose! [ 04 Jan 2011, 17:33 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Last years bandwidth |
Surprisingly enough, I did as well, maybe because I was subconsciously reading yours instead. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC+02:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited |