[SpA]Greasy_greabo wrote:
I intend not to, but they wont include a proper inbuilt system, and will instead have a lazy ass game made for consoles and bean flickers.
Dont get me wrong, pander to those people who want to dip in and out of a game, touch their bum with a candle and have a poor, shallow version of a game released 10 years ago. Just realise another one alongside which doesn't. Take out the reduction in skills and customization, rather than 'consolidating' aka removing features. Why is it that they think taking things out of a game is a feature, this may well be more of a rant targeted to oblivion, only because thats all ive got to base this game on other than what I've read, but jesus don't make everything as simple as 1,2,3 and claim its a feature - its not, its a freakin anti-feature.
Something also that bugs me, you go to a dungeon and the mobs lock at your level, forever. Eh? I don't get it. So you suck and die to equal levelled mobs, so they say, its ok, just go away and come back in a few hours and the mobs will just be dawdling and jerkin it to harry krishna, and you can 1 shot them all. NOW THIS IS FUN INIT BOYS.
Nah this game will be fine, but if it goes in anyway the same direction as oblivion then it wont be more than just fine, which it could be, it could be ruddy brilliant.
/rant
This, with the exception of the fact that its "hare krishna".
Morrowind will I fear be the high point of the elder scrolls series though I have a hard point picking between it and Daggerfall.
_________________
I take it all back. FFFFFFUUUUUU cardboard!!!!!