Multi-Gaming Community
It is currently 16 Jun 2025, 13:08

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Older computer
PostPosted: 15 Nov 2008, 09:39 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1120)
I have this other, older computer (4ghz processor, 2048mb ram, running Vista Home Premium), and even the simplest of 3d-games (Peggle, for instance) lags like hell on it.

Would this computer be to crap to run Vista and simultaneously run simple computer games (according to this, it should at least be able to run Vista) and do I need to revert back to XP? Any other possible reasons?

_________________
slurper


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 15 Nov 2008, 10:29 
Offline
Geek (877)
User avatar
Tell us about your graphics card.

_________________
^.-
motherfuckin rabbits ejaculating sunshine


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 15 Nov 2008, 11:16 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1120)
Can't go check right now, but it was decent enough for Half-Life 2 back when I was running XP, at least.

Drivers might be old now (since last format), but I don't see how that would affect utterly simple games such as Peggle and the like.

_________________
slurper


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2008, 00:49 
Offline
Geek (690)
User avatar
nein! wrote:
older computer (4ghz processor
Uh what

What's the newer like then


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2008, 01:55 
Offline
Doesn't get out much (314)
User avatar
Quote:
older computer (4ghz processor, 2048mb ram, running Vista Home Premium)
You ruined my life. Now I don't know how to call my computer :( (1,8ghz processor, 768MB RAM, GF FX5200, running Windows XP).

Some advices:
- turn off Aero.
- kill as many useless processes as you can (with Process Explorer it's very easy to find, which are useless for OS)
- turn min. details ;DD


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2008, 02:48 
Offline
The Necromancer (4970)
One thing: turning off Areo doesn't do crap. It might put less strain on your computer graphically when the effects show up BUT the Window Manager still uses up as many resources as with Areo turned on - I checked. Another thing is that when you launch full-screen 3D applications Areo is turned off automatically and Vista frees up resources as needed (kinda like Linux) so this isn't the main concern here, methinks.

Still, I wouldn't recommend running Vista on older computers or ones that barely pass the minimum spec requirements. From my experience Vista runs great when you have a good enough computer but becomes hard to bear when you got a slower one. It's as if there was an invisible performance barrier to get all the cogs going...

_________________
War does not determine who is right - only who is left. - Bertrand Russell


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2008, 12:58 
Offline
SpA Fookah (4459)
User avatar
get vista off that machine for once

_________________
M.A.S.K. , is the mighty power that can save the day


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2008, 13:56 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1120)
[SpA]Bucky wrote:
get vista off that machine for once
nein! wrote:
Would this computer be to crap to run Vista and simultaneously run simple computer games (according to this, it should at least be able to run Vista) and do I need to revert back to XP? Any other possible reasons?
The whole point of the topic was that I wanted to know if there could be any other reasons to this, I already know everything works fine on Windows XP.

Apparently I do need to revert back to XP. :66

_________________
slurper


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2008, 15:21 
Offline
The Necromancer (4970)
Yes you do... However, keep in mind that Vista is meanwhile actually FASTER than XP if you got the proper hardware (and only then) and don't let XP fanboys or Vista haters convince you otherwise. The benchmarks are easy to find on the internet. =)

It's just like XP which is faster than Win2K on comparable hardware but only if you meet (or rather: surpass) its requirements.

_________________
War does not determine who is right - only who is left. - Bertrand Russell


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2008, 16:27 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1120)
After having a look at the nVidia graphic card, I set the global settings from "quality" to "performance", and am now getting good FPS in HL1 games and Peggle. I thought I had tampered with all those settings. Oh well, minor victory. :mrgreen:

_________________
slurper


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 18 Nov 2008, 11:59 
Offline
Geek (778)
User avatar
[SpA]Lim-Dul wrote:
Yes you do... However, keep in mind that Vista is meanwhile actually FASTER than XP if you got the proper hardware (and only then) and don't let XP fanboys or Vista haters convince you otherwise. The benchmarks are easy to find on the internet. =)

It's just like XP which is faster than Win2K on comparable hardware but only if you meet (or rather: surpass) its requirements.
Hmm, while i agree with you, Vista doesn't like Direct X 9.

_________________
Computer is fixed. That is all.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 22 Nov 2008, 21:30 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (3493)
User avatar
I'm running with the same OS and same amount of ram, but a (dual core) processor that's 0.9ghz slower, and I've got no lag at all pretty much. So, I'd imagine it's the graphics card - try fiddling with settings a bit more? ;p

oh, and vista runs far better if it's updated, so do that if you haven't already.

_________________
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: true genius
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: doesn't make sense
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: till you're senseless


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 23 Nov 2008, 12:39 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1120)
ETMI wrote:
I'm running with the same OS and same amount of ram, but a (dual core) processor that's 0.9ghz slower, and I've got no lag at all pretty much. So, I'd imagine it's the graphics card - try fiddling with settings a bit more? ;p

oh, and vista runs far better if it's updated, so do that if you haven't already.
It is fully updated, and the processor is dual-core. What graphics card are you using?

I've fiddled around with everything worth fiddling with.

_________________
slurper


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 23 Nov 2008, 14:46 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (3493)
User avatar
nein! wrote:
ETMI wrote:
I'm running with the same OS and same amount of ram, but a (dual core) processor that's 0.9ghz slower, and I've got no lag at all pretty much. So, I'd imagine it's the graphics card - try fiddling with settings a bit more? ;p

oh, and vista runs far better if it's updated, so do that if you haven't already.
It is fully updated, and the processor is dual-core. What graphics card are you using?

I've fiddled around with everything worth fiddling with.
nVidia 8800gt 512mb.
runs tf2, hl2 - pretty much everything - at 60fps pretty much constantly.

(I take it the ram is DDR2, not ridiculously outdated etc?)

_________________
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: true genius
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: doesn't make sense
ュ~ちゃんgamer.jp Pinky: till you're senseless


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Older computer
PostPosted: 23 Nov 2008, 16:53 
Offline
Has no REAL life! (1120)
ETMI wrote:
nVidia 8800gt 512mb.
runs tf2, hl2 - pretty much everything - at 60fps pretty much constantly.

(I take it the ram is DDR2, not ridiculously outdated etc?)
That's the exact card I run on my main computer, so the other one might just be "ridiculously outdated", will edit once checked

_________________
slurper


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited